Doug's world

Doug Saunders has quite the wagon-load of wishful thinking on view in my Globe and Mail today. The headline gives it away; "Canada  almost saved Venezuela - until Washington crashed the party."

That's right! Canada has been working really hard behind the scenes to restore democracy in Venezuela, and we nearly pulled it off, but then "one man walked into the room, late to the party, and began shouting his support."

That man would be Donald Trump, of course, the know-nothing imbecile currently in the White House. Fearing that the deft diplomacy of Chrystia Freeland would knock him off the top of the news cycle for a few minutes, Trump elbowed his way into a situation that was none of his business, and wrecked all our hard work.

So there you have it. A peaceful transition was within reach, with perhaps a Nobel Peace Prize nomination for Chrystia following soon after...

Hard to know where to begin. First of all, Trump isn't exactly late to the party. America's regime change strategy (also known as "restoring democracy," per the time-honoured US tradition we have seen applied in Iran, Guatemala, Chile, Brazil, Haiti, Honduras, among others) vis-a-vis Venezuela dates back to the election of Chavez twenty years ago.

In the interval, the US has funded many opposition initiatives in Venezuela, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars through agencies such as the National Endowment for Democracy. The "party" going on in Venezuela is pretty much Uncle Sam's party. It's Chrystia and Justin who arrived late.

Secondly, why no mention of US sanctions? I have no doubt that corruption and ineptitude have played a significant role in creating the current mess, but surely many years of US-led sanctions deserve some credit. Doug carefully avoids any mention of the recent Alfred de Zayas UN report on the impact of those sanctions.

Speaking of corruption and ineptitude, Canadians need to take a good hard look at our bedfellows in the "Lima Group." We've tossed our lot in with the likes of Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina... any of which could give Venezuela a run for its money in the corruption department. By the way, it's worth noting that the new government in Mexico has been distancing itself from the Lima Group, an act of Trump defiance, which is the exact opposite of what Justin and Chrystia are doing.

Finally, given that Doug's column bears little or no resemblance to the actual political history of US-Venezuela relations over the past two decades, what do you suppose would be the point in writing it?

I see two objectives.

The reputation of the Freeland-Trudeau team on the world stage has taken quite a bruising after diplomatic screw-ups with India, China, Saudi Arabia, and the US. The brain-trust guiding Canada's newspaper of record may believe a little turd-polishing is in order, and what better way to signal our virtue than by taking another gratuitous kick at the Orange Ogre.

The truth of the matter is that Canada and the rest of the "Lima Group" satrapys are 100% bent on advancing America's two-decades-long regime-change strategy in Venezuela. Dissing Trump while kissing Uncle Sam's backside is what used to be called hypocrisy... and that's an arena in which Canada truly does punch above its weight.

Spinning Venezuela

"World leaders back Guaido in a divided Venezuela." That's a headline on page A5 in today's Globe and Mail.

Which world leaders? All of them? Most of them? Some of them? Or the usual gang of Uncle Sam's flunkies who enthusiastically toady to every whim of the Exceptional Nation?

Seems like it's the last of those options. Then why not give us an honest headline, something along the lines of "US and some allies back Guaido in divided Venezuela?" After all, anyone remotely informed knows that Venezuela has been in the cross-hairs of America's military-industrial machine since the election of Chavez twenty years ago, and throughout those twenty years the US has worked tirelessly to undermine the elected government and divide the Venezuelan people.

Stephanie Nolen's article takes pains to emphasize Canada's role in the unfolding drama, because "punching above our weight" sells well here. The reality of our involvement is that we're at every step doing the bidding of the Trump regime, but that's a truth that won't go down well with the Canadian public, so let's bamboozle our readers with loads 'o horseshit about freedom and democracy and standing up to evil dictators.

Funny how the Nations of Virtue can speak with one voice about authoritarianism in a state on Washington's shit list, but when a house pet of the West like Paul Kagame wins 99% of the vote in a "free and fair" (nudge, wink, ahem..) election, we congratulate him on his success!

Canada's official state media take a similar tack on the Venezuela story. Our "quiet diplomacy" is inching that aching land towards freedom, dontcha know! Of course we are! Chrystia Freeland herself takes great pride in her work advancing Washington's agenda, as is obvious when you read the article. Sometimes the only way to advance democracy is by overthrowing the elected leader and putting in someone more amenable to taking direction from Washington, as we saw a few years ago in Ukraine, and in Honduras before that.

Here's a story I haven't seen at CBC or in the Globe; UN special rapporteur Alfred de Zaya says US sanctions are killing people in Venezuela. Not only that, but the international law expert says those sanctions are illegal and a crime against humanity.

You'd think an impartial news service interested in informing its readership would throw that into the mix somewhere, wouldn't you?