Making Tsarnaev a martyr invites blow-back

There's more than a few unanswered questions about the Boston Bombing, and none of them were answered in the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

How did a "terror attack" that approximated the damage of a bad car accident instantly lead to a shock and awe siege of Boston? More went on in Boston than meets the eye, and DT is the fall-guy.

His conviction and subsequent death penalty are erroneously assumed to provide "closure."

It won't.

Instead, it will provoke more people to ask more questions.

For starters, how did these guys who were on FBI/CIA/FSA radar manage to pull this off?

And how did their terror attack happen to coincide with a FBI/CIA/FSA anti-terror exercise?

You can't make these questions go away just by hanging Tsarnaev.

Washington Post confirms Boston-bomber linked suspect was unarmed when executed

When Ibragim Todeshev was dispatched during interrogation by the FBI a week ago, there were eyebrows raised all over the place.

The official story was that the suspect attacked his interrogators with a knife, thereby provoking the lethal response.

The Washington Post just came out with this story.

Quoting two sources on the scene, the WP is reporting that Todeshev was unarmed.

This is significant because everybody understands that given a choice, the Post would far rather spin a story in favor of the FBI than in favor of a young Muslim implicated in a domestic terror attack.

There is obviously far more to this story than has met our eyes as of yet.

Why the FBI was so quick to i.d. the Boston Bombers

Because they've been tracking them for years!

Sound familiar? How many of the 9/11 19 had been tracked for years before September 2001?

Does this speak to the efficiency of the FBI or the incompetence of the FBI?